Skip to main content
AI Agent Configurator

Configure Your AI Agent
With The Right LLM

Every AI agent task demands different strengths - raw coding power, autonomous CLI execution, deep reasoning, or maximum context. Match your workload to the best model with real benchmark data, live cost estimates, and task-specific recommendations.

12
Models Tracked
5
Benchmarks
8
Task Profiles
Jun 2026
Updated

Find Your AI Model

Pick your task profile and see which models score highest based on weighted benchmark matching. Adjust session parameters to estimate real-world costs.

Hermes Agent

Hermes needs reliable tool calling, large context (memory + conversation), and prompt caching for long sessions. DeepSeek V4 Pro is the default.

Tool CallingPrompt CachingStructured OutputThinking Mode

Top Recommendations for Hermes Agent

1
DeepSeek

V4 Pro

1.6T MoE with 49B active per token. MIT open-source. 1M context with hybrid attention (CSA+HCA). State-of-the-art competitive coding and math reasoning at 7-9x lower cost than frontier models.

99%
Context
1.0M
SWE-Verified
80.6%
Terminal-Bench
67.9%
GPQA
90.1%
Est. Session Cost
$0.057
Price/MTok Out
$0.87
Open SourceThinking
2
MiniMax

MiniMax M3

Open-weight surprise. 92.68% GPQA Diamond, 80.5% SWE-bench Verified. 1M context. Very strong reasoning at $0.30-$0.60 input. Best value open-weight model.

98%
Context
1.0M
SWE-Verified
80.5%
Terminal-Bench
66.0%
GPQA
92.7%
Est. Session Cost
$0.099
Price/MTok Out
$1.80
Open SourceThinking
3
DeepSeek

V4 Flash

284B MoE with 13B active per token. MIT open-source. Ultra-cheap at $0.14/$0.28 per MTok. 1M context. Perfect for high-volume, cost-sensitive production workloads.

96%
Context
1.0M
SWE-Verified
79.0%
Terminal-Bench
56.9%
GPQA
88.1%
Est. Session Cost
$0.018
Price/MTok Out
$0.28
Open SourceThinking

All Models Ranked

RankModelScoreSession CostInput $Output $
1
V4 Pro
DeepSeek
99%$0.057$0.43$0.87
2
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
98%$0.099$0.45$1.80
3
V4 Flash
DeepSeek
96%$0.018$0.14$0.28
4
Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
78%$0.900$3.00$15.00
5
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
73%$0.260$1.00$4.00
6
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
72%$0.680$2.00$12.00
7
Opus 4.8
Anthropic
62%$1.500$5.00$25.00
8
GPT 5.3 Codex
OpenAI
60%$0.656$1.75$14.00
9
Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
54%$0.300$1.00$5.00
10
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
46%$1.575$5.00$30.00
11
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
36%$0.738$2.50$15.00
12
Fable 5
Anthropic
32%$3.000$10.00$50.00

AI Model Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of every frontier model across SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0, GPQA Diamond, and MMLU-Pro. Sort by any column. Click any row for full details.

Open
1.0M95.0%80.3%$10.00/$50.00
1.0M88.6%69.2%93.6%89.1%$5.00/$25.00
1.0M80.6%55.4%67.9%90.1%87.5%$0.43/$0.87
1.0M80.6%54.2%94.3%92.6%$2.00/$12.00
1.0M80.5%66.0%92.7%84.2%$0.45/$1.80
256K80.2%66.7%$1.00/$4.00
1.0M79.6%42.8%82.0%84.6%$3.00/$15.00
1.0M79.0%56.9%88.1%86.2%$0.14/$0.28
200K73.3%39.5%$1.00/$5.00
400K58.6%82.7%$5.00/$30.00
400K77.3%$1.75/$14.00
400K51.9%$2.50/$15.00

Data sourced from vendor reports, SWE-bench leaderboard, and third-party benchmarks as of June 17, 2026. Click a row for full details.

Cost Calculator

Pick two models and see exactly how much you'd save per session, per month, and per year. Adjust turns, token counts, and session frequency to match your workload.

Input/MTok
$0.435
Output/MTok
$0.87
Per Session
$0.057
Monthly (30 sessions)
$1.70
Input/MTok
$5.000
Output/MTok
$25.00
Per Session
$1.500
Monthly (30 sessions)
$45.00
V4 Pro saves $43.30/month vs Opus 4.8
That's 96% cheaper — $520/year

How We Score Models

SWE-bench Verified

weight: 0-40%

Real-world GitHub issues. Models fix actual bugs in Python repos using a standardized scaffold. The best predictor of production coding ability.

Terminal-Bench 2.0

weight: 0-40%

Autonomous CLI agent tasks. Models navigate file systems, run builds, orchestrate shell commands - measures true agent autonomy.

GPQA Diamond

weight: 0-40%

Expert-level science questions (PhD-level biology, physics, chemistry). Measures deep reasoning ability beyond surface pattern matching.

MMLU-Pro

weight: 0-30%

Massive multitask language understanding - 57 subjects across STEM, humanities, and social sciences. Broad knowledge benchmark.

Data sourced from SWE-bench leaderboard, vendor technical reports (DeepSeek, Anthropic, OpenAI), Artificial Analysis, and third-party evaluators. Artificial Analysis, and third-party evaluators. Last updated June 17, 2026. Pricing verified against official API documentation.

n8n Lab

Let Us Help You Win Tomorrow's Automation Landscape

Start eliminating manual bottlenecks with custom n8n automation. Let us architect the system for you.

Book Strategy Call
Jovan
Stefan
Nemanja
Davor

Our Team

Ready to help

n8n Expert Partner
n8n Setup Included
Trusted by 50+ Companies

n8n Lab is an independent service provider. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by n8n GmbH. “n8n” is a trademark of n8n GmbH and is used here only to describe the platform-specific implementation and automation services we provide.